From: Jason Opperisano <opie@817west.com>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: bad tcp packets
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 08:49:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1101217785.12981.10.camel@hubcap.ljm.dom> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <web-23112413@infinito.it>
On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 07:18, hamals@infinito.it wrote:
> Hello to everyone
>
> I'm reading "Iptables Tutorial 1.1.19" by Oskar
> Andreasoon, and I cant understand these bad packets rules
>
>
> $IPTABLES -N bad_tcp_packets
> #
> #
> # bad_tcp_packets chain
> #
> $IPTABLES -A bad_tcp_packets -p tcp --tcp-flags SYN,ACK
> SYN,ACK \
> -m state --state NEW -j REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset
SYN-ACK packets are step 2 in the TCP Three Way Handshake, and are
always replies to SYN packets (which are step 1). as a reminder, the
TCP Three Way Handshake is:
client server
---------------
SYN ->
<- SYN-ACK
ACK ->
also as a reminder, "-m state --state NEW" packets are packets that do
not match an entry in conntrack.
if your are tracking the state of your connections:
"-p tcp -m state --state NEW" packets should only ever be SYN packets
(as they come first)
the above rule sends a TCP RST to any SYN-ACK packet that is NEW; i.e, a
response to a connection request that we never saw.
> $IPTABLES -A bad_tcp_packets -p tcp ! --syn -m state
> --state NEW -j LOG \
> --log-prefix "New not syn:"
> $IPTABLES -A bad_tcp_packets -p tcp ! --syn -m state
> --state NEW -j DROP
this drops and logs NEW packets that are anything besides a SYN packet.
-j
--
"I've figured out an alternative to giving up my beer. Basically,
we become a family of traveling acrobats!"
--The Simpsons
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-23 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-23 12:18 bad tcp packets hamals
2004-11-23 12:42 ` Miguel Angel Amador L
2004-11-23 13:49 ` Jason Opperisano [this message]
2004-11-23 13:59 ` Frank Gruellich
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-11-23 13:39 Scott Knake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1101217785.12981.10.camel@hubcap.ljm.dom \
--to=opie@817west.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox