Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "John A. Sullivan III" <jsullivan@opensourcedevel.com>
To: Dave Beach <drbeach@rogers.com>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Networking question
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 13:53:58 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1135450438.2584.4.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAAqrTb2LYes02Oflamihm4wwL6DwAQAAAAdIdG2rUYq0C89CEWuAaQWwEAAAAA@rogers.com>

On Sat, 2005-12-24 at 13:34 -0500, Dave Beach wrote:
>  This is undoubtedly off-topic in oh-so-many ways; I'd be quite happy to be
> redirected to another, more appropriate mailing list should someone be so
> kind as to suggest one.
> 
> Internal, home, private network, WinXP boxen and a Squid proxy, connecting
> through an iptables box to my router and cable modem. Everything works
> peachy.
> 
> While trying to poke bittorrent holes through my iptables setup (see? Some
> vague evidence of relevance), I encountered problems and decided to take the
> proxy out of the picture. VERY much to my surprise, when I reconfigured IE
> to not use the proxy (and configured iptables to allow for a direct
> connection), I see no HTTP traffic whatsoever leaving the XP box destined
> for the firewall. In fact, no TCP traffic either (all traffic analysis done
> with ethereal on the XP box). I can ping to/from the XP box, and see THAT
> via ethereal.
> 
> I am considerably confused by this. My presumption was that IE would just
> happily send HTTP traffic directly to the firewall, but this is NOT the
> behaviour I'm seeing.
> 
> I know it's Christmas Eve day, and I was out a bit late last night, but
> there's clearly something VERY obvious I'm missing.
> 
> 
If the problem is on the XP station (no packets egressing), could there
be an XP personal firewall problem? - John
-- 
John A. Sullivan III
Open Source Development Corporation
+1 207-985-7880
jsullivan@opensourcedevel.com

Financially sustainable open source development
http://www.opensourcedevel.com



  reply	other threads:[~2005-12-24 18:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-24 18:11 Simple routing configuration Paul Lewis
2005-12-24 18:32 ` John A. Sullivan III
2005-12-24 18:34 ` Networking question Dave Beach
2005-12-24 18:53   ` John A. Sullivan III [this message]
2005-12-24 18:56     ` /dev/rob0
2005-12-24 18:58   ` Edmundo Carmona
2005-12-24 19:02     ` Dave Beach
     [not found] <65aa6af90512241106v5e49da74jc54fa7821960ed28@mail.gmail.com>
2005-12-24 19:09 ` Dave Beach
2005-12-24 19:17   ` Edmundo Carmona
2005-12-24 20:00     ` Dave Beach
2005-12-24 20:16       ` Edmundo Carmona

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1135450438.2584.4.camel@localhost \
    --to=jsullivan@opensourcedevel.com \
    --cc=drbeach@rogers.com \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox