Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Leblond <eric@inl.fr>
To: devel@regnard.org
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: conntrack utility
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 23:51:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1150840298.23087.5.camel@porky> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44982BF1.8090102@regnard.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1738 bytes --]

Hi,

In fact it works !

But you mainly have to use subversion to get something working with
recent kernel.

An alternative is to use the archive I've generated in the scope of nufw
and of an article to come in Linux Magazine France :
	http://www.nufw.org/download/libs/

Netfilter core team are aware of the problem and should do a release
quiet soon. But they are quiet busy nowadays :-(

BR,

On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 19:10 +0200, Vincent Regnard wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I've been playing with the conntrack recently, mainly to get 
> conntrack_sip working. Because I had some problems having it working on 
> a router with no nat. I compiled the conntrack utility, expecting to 
> make some debug with it. But I cannot have the conntrack utility 
> working. I use latest available version of the required libs and utility:
> 
> - libnfnetlink-0.0.14
> - libnetfilter_conntrack-0.0.30
> - conntrack-1.00beta1
> 
> together with a kernel 2.6.16.20 and iptables 1.3.5
> 
> When invoking conntrack as root I always get the following error:
> 
> Operation failed: invalid parameters
> 
> I am apparently not the only one having this kind of trouble (cf this 
> list post on february 17th). I am wondering if there is any chance I can 
> have a release of conntrack working. Do some of you have it working (if 
> so what version of the libraries/conttrack do you play with ?).
> 
> If you have any hints, I would be glad to ear from you. Just knowing it 
> work somewhere else and people use it sometimes would make me happy, so 
> I could carry on compiling on other environement and pray god a bit more 
> longer.
> 
> thanks for your feedback
> 
> Vincent
> 
-- 
Eric Leblond <eric@inl.fr>
INL

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2006-06-20 21:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-20 17:10 conntrack utility Vincent Regnard
2006-06-20 21:51 ` Eric Leblond [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1150840298.23087.5.camel@porky \
    --to=eric@inl.fr \
    --cc=devel@regnard.org \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox