Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Evgeniy Zaitsev <eightn@roger.net.ru>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: CONNMARK patch do not work in kernel 2.6.9
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 13:24:15 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1241129595.20041204132415@roger.net.ru> (raw)

Hello.

I try to use latest patch-o-matic to
I have tried to use last patch-o-matic
(patch-o-matic-ng-20040621.tar.bz2 also do not work)
for addition of purpose CONNMARK in iptables on a kernel 2.6.9

But the patch is not set, as does not find the necessary lines of a code in a file
linux/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_standalone.c

================code===================
diff -uN --exclude .* --exclude *.o linux-2.4.3-pre3/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_standalone.c
linux-2.4.3-pre3-uml/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_standalone.c
--- linux-2.4.3-pre3/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_standalone.c       Thu Aug 10 21:35:15 2000
+++ linux-2.4.3-pre3-uml/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_standalone.c   Wed Mar 21 13:04:19 2001
@@ -92,6 +92,9 @@
                len += sprintf(buffer + len, "[UNCONFIRMED] ");
        len += sprintf(buffer + len, "use=%u ",
                       atomic_read(&conntrack->ct_general.use));
+#if defined(CONFIG_IP_NF_CONNTRACK_MARK)
+       len += sprintf(buffer + len, "mark=%ld ", conntrack->mark);
+#endif
        len += sprintf(buffer + len, "\n");

        return len;  
================/code==================



The code "&conntrack->ct_general.use" is mentioned in this piece:

Will not prompt where to make changes what it would be possible to activate CONNMARK on a nucleus 2.6.9?
================code===================
if (test_bit(IPS_ASSURED_BIT, &conntrack->status))
   if (seq_printf(s, "[ASSURED] "))
      return 1;

if (seq_printf(s, "use=%u\n", atomic_read(&conntrack->ct_general.use)))
   return 1;

return 0;
}

================/code==================

but this code is completely not similar that in a patch.

Prompt please, it is necessary to bring in what changes to a kernel
2.6.9, that CONNMARK would work?


-- 
Best regards,
 Evgeniy                          mailto:eightn@roger.net.ru



             reply	other threads:[~2004-12-04 10:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-04 10:24 Evgeniy Zaitsev [this message]
2004-12-05 15:19 ` CONNMARK patch do not work in kernel 2.6.9 Lopsch
2004-12-13 22:28   ` Re[2]: " Evgeniy Zaitsev
2004-12-14  1:41     ` Lopsch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1241129595.20041204132415@roger.net.ru \
    --to=eightn@roger.net.ru \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox