From: Optimum Wireless Services <wilson@optimumwireless.com>
To: Marek Kierdelewicz <marek@piasta.pl>
Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: How can I test my tc script?
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 09:45:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1296827153.3644.7.camel@debian-laptop.OptimumWireless> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110203120131.38cd818d@catus>
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 12:01 +0100, Marek Kierdelewicz wrote:
> >Hello.
>
> Hi,
>
> >I recently wrote a script that adds a new rule for an ip address each
> >time a new user is added to our network. I've noticed my tc rules work
> >...
> >Our network has about 120 users in total not all of these get connected
> >Are these rules ok?
>
> If you have such linear ruleset (iptables marking+tc filter) for 120
> users then it's will not work well. If my theory is right, check top
> when there are more users logged in. You'll probably see hi cpu usage
> in "si"/"hi" (software/hardware interrupt) fraction.
>
> You can easily optimize you ruleset by using:
> - tc u32 hashing filters [1] instead of iptables marking and fw tc
> filters;
> - shape upload on ifb device [2] in ingress before nat, so you can use
> tc u32 hashing filters too;
>
> With such setup Core2 duo 3GHz + dual port intel nic can easily
> (
> 68% peak cpu usage) route symmetric 400mbit of traffic, doing per user
> shaping, nat and access control for >2k users.
>
>
> [1] http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.adv-filter.hashing.html
> [2] http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/networking/ifb
>
After reading the lartc and the linuxfoundation.org documentation about
the u32 hashing filters it leaves me very confused. I don't get how I
would write my ruleset for all the users I have.
Would I have to create a table for each ip and then create a filter to
match? for ie:
tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 match ip src \
172.16.100.1 classid 1:1
tc filter add dev eth1 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 5 u32 ht 2:7b: \
match ip src 172.16.100.1 flowid 1:1
tc filter add dev eth1 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 5 u32 ht 800:: \
match ip src 172.16.100.1/16 \
hashkey mask 0x000000ff at 12 \
link 2:
This method is somewhat complicated but, according to the documentation
"very worth it".
Can someone please explain it a little better, thanks.
> Best regards,
> Marek Kierdelewicz
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-04 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-03 2:17 How can I test my tc script? Optimum Wireless Services
2011-02-03 11:01 ` Marek Kierdelewicz
2011-02-03 14:13 ` Optimum Wireless Services
2011-02-03 15:06 ` Marek Kierdelewicz
2011-02-03 16:18 ` Optimum Wireless Services
2011-02-04 13:45 ` Optimum Wireless Services [this message]
2011-02-04 16:49 ` Optimum Wireless Services
2011-02-04 19:57 ` Optimum Wireless Services
2011-02-05 12:29 ` Andrew Beverley
2011-02-05 19:32 ` Marek Kierdelewicz
2011-02-05 19:29 ` Marek Kierdelewicz
2011-02-05 20:21 ` Marek Kierdelewicz
2011-02-06 0:05 ` Marek Kierdelewicz
2011-02-06 2:24 ` Optimum Wireless Services
2011-02-04 14:22 ` Michele Petrazzo - Unipex
2011-02-05 2:08 ` Andrew Beverley
2011-02-05 14:58 ` Marek Kierdelewicz
2011-02-05 16:37 ` Andrew Beverley
2011-02-05 16:48 ` good tutorial J Webster
2011-02-05 19:22 ` Andrew Beverley
2011-02-05 19:33 ` J Webster
2011-02-05 19:51 ` Bob Miller
2011-02-05 22:47 ` Andrew Beverley
2011-02-05 22:44 ` Andrew Beverley
2011-02-05 17:04 ` How can I test my tc script? Marek Kierdelewicz
2011-02-06 2:12 ` Optimum Wireless Services
2011-02-06 16:13 ` Andrew Beverley
2011-02-07 8:20 ` Michele Petrazzo - Unipex
2011-02-03 19:38 ` Andrew Beverley
2011-02-05 2:44 ` Optimum Wireless Services
2011-02-05 6:07 ` Optimum Wireless Services
2011-02-05 12:27 ` Andrew Beverley
2011-02-06 2:14 ` Optimum Wireless Services
2011-02-06 16:15 ` Andrew Beverley
2011-02-06 16:35 ` Optimum Wireless Services
2011-02-06 17:02 ` Andrew Beverley
2011-02-06 23:27 ` Optimum Wireless Services
2011-02-08 0:56 ` Andrew Beverley
2011-02-08 2:11 ` Optimum Wireless Services
2011-02-08 6:52 ` Andrew Beverley
2011-02-08 2:20 ` Optimum Wireless Services
2011-02-08 6:53 ` Andrew Beverley
2011-02-06 16:44 ` Marek Kierdelewicz
2011-02-06 23:31 ` Optimum Wireless Services
2011-02-08 0:58 ` Andrew Beverley
2011-02-05 12:35 ` Andrew Beverley
2011-02-06 2:17 ` Optimum Wireless Services
2011-02-06 15:54 ` Andrew Beverley
2011-02-06 16:28 ` Optimum Wireless Services
2011-02-06 17:11 ` Andrew Beverley
2011-02-06 23:33 ` Optimum Wireless Services
2011-02-08 1:01 ` Andrew Beverley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1296827153.3644.7.camel@debian-laptop.OptimumWireless \
--to=wilson@optimumwireless.com \
--cc=marek@piasta.pl \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox