From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Optimum Wireless Services Subject: Re: How can I test my tc script? Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 19:31:42 -0400 Message-ID: <1297035102.3928.28.camel@debian-laptop.OptimumWireless> References: <1296699466.4606.14.camel@debian-laptop.OptimumWireless> <1296761916.7587.29.camel@andybev> <1296873898.3644.4.camel@debian-laptop.OptimumWireless> <1296886030.4568.6.camel@debian-laptop.OptimumWireless> <1296908825.1695.8.camel@andybev> <1296958497.3695.18.camel@debian-laptop.OptimumWireless> <1297008953.1613.24.camel@andybev> <20110206174446.6abdcf58@catus> Reply-To: wilson@optimumwireless.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110206174446.6abdcf58@catus> Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Marek Kierdelewicz Cc: Andrew Beverley , netfilter@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 17:44 +0100, Marek Kierdelewicz wrote: > >> I have 120 users now but, that number should be increasing. Which > >> method do you recommend? > >I think that you should forget the per-user stuff as per my other email > >and classify traffic. Just my personal opinion - I'd be interested to > >hear what others think. > > Well. It all depends on the bussiness constrains. Per-user shaping is > sometimes necessary while it's definitely more complex and > resource-consuming. My personal opinion - with >100 users shaping rules > should be script-generated instead of written by hand. > I don't know which is the best solution for a WISP, since it would be adding and deleting customers regularly. Per-user shaping might be necessary for most ISPs, I think, because they sell different plans for different necesities. I think batch rules should be script-generated and deleted as customers come and go. > Best regards, > Marek Kierdelewicz