From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Beverley Subject: Re: trouble setting default route for load-balancing routing tables Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 20:34:06 +0000 Message-ID: <1321821246.2382.1044.camel@andybev-desktop> References: <1321798603.2382.987.camel@andybev-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=andybev.com; s=selector1; t=1321821246; bh=Yg0xPygFvR16iJLr2wJE2Uqi8rMRVWQvsdTNfZmY/J4=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-ID:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=rl3fn9BpOBuU3nJbrPU6zuegAfLOs3VqaEOVPQSV4b8/wXPI1HCPTaH2v38f2qd0A qWXeOfJzlkeNPq9CeuzQKzGYKe5j5H08WwXQNQ6mzZRXkNSzi0pueiEw5T4dwKvYej SHE0a0bOB6IYWxQ4zC1Nzd1ZOd3uZN70XqZ6bdOs= In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Lloyd Standish Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2011-11-20 at 09:10 -0600, Lloyd Standish wrote: > Now that the default routes are set in tables T1 and T0, the above > rules to "override" the load-balancing appear to work perfectly. The > router will ONLY send packets to T1 (eth1) for those subnets, Ah, got you. So you're splitting the network by subnets and routing over the link depending on the subnet. Therefore packets from one client PC will always go over the same link? Andy