From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Beverley Subject: Re: connmark problem Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 22:35:42 +0100 Message-ID: <1340746542.1654.26.camel@andrew-desktop> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=andybev.com; s=selector1; t=1340746546; bh=x0sr1FagMGVJVZjy8DZt5fnBqQ9PEmhysb0rMKZts5A=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version; b=hZhrsELAIGyqAE0Pi8X3c+o8YD2T9JXmrKmsxBrJx6fNnBDLRU/sekC3HLqGawD/5 lB548yB3gmXNtuUFPco8VhyywLI1rmugmmb+4JapKZCoQboIkqzP2Q8AGGgENYW3/k 2lyb6v1o4osGe+PPNr0rD4I3F4vf/7QUXhdVck3k= Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Oguz Yilmaz Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 11:38 +0300, Oguz Yilmaz wrote: > Hi > > I use connmark in raw table. Please look at the following -L output. > At the beginning of the chain I copy packet mark to the connection. -m > mark matches packets. However -m connmark not matches. It is clearly > visible from packet counters. > How can we explain this? I'm guessing this is because the raw table is traversed before connection tracking. See: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/37/Netfilter-packet-flow.svg Andy