From: Bob Miller <bob@computerisms.ca>
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: iptaccount vs nfacct
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 16:47:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1392252442.30958.596.camel@worklian> (raw)
Hello,
to present day I have been using the ACCOUNT function in xtables-addons
to do bandwidth accounting.
I have spent some time poking around on the net trying to figure out
exactly what nfacct does, and it seems this tool could also be used for
bandwidth accounting.
But I am having trouble finding anything regarding the wisdom of such a
migration. Are there documents, or would someone be willing to offer
some opinions, pertaining to the benefits or detriments of switching
over?
--
Computerisms
Bob Miller
867-334-7117 / 867-633-3760
http://computerisms.ca
next reply other threads:[~2014-02-13 0:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-13 0:47 Bob Miller [this message]
2014-02-13 8:55 ` iptaccount vs nfacct Eric Leblond
2014-02-13 17:43 ` Bob Miller
2014-02-13 19:55 ` Eric Leblond
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1392252442.30958.596.camel@worklian \
--to=bob@computerisms.ca \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox