From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nikolai Lusan <nikolai@lusan.id.au>
Subject: QoS in Netfilter
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 18:57:43 +1000
Message-ID: <1397638663.12394.1.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-oDMedC2u5HjQVE/1YIyW"
Return-path: <netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netfilter.vger.kernel.org>
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org


--=-oDMedC2u5HjQVE/1YIyW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

So the merits of MARK vs. CLASSIFY? What do people think is the best way
of using QoS?

--=20
Nikolai Lusan <nikolai@lusan.id.au>

--=-oDMedC2u5HjQVE/1YIyW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=axSN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-oDMedC2u5HjQVE/1YIyW--