From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Geffrey Velasquez Subject: Re[2]: Source and Destination port 0 Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 15:04:30 -0500 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <1579619637.20030715150430@netfids.com> References: <7C9884991ADAE0479C14F10C858BCDF52E359A@alderaan.smgtec.com> <20030715195114.GM24604@cannon.eng.us.uu.net> Reply-To: Geffrey Velasquez Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20030715195114.GM24604@cannon.eng.us.uu.net> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Ramin Dousti Cc: Daniel Chemko , netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Hello Ramin and Daniel, thank you for the information, I will read the RFC then I will try to block on the firewall, I will be giving more information to the list. Regards, Geffrey RD> On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 12:36:16PM -0700, Daniel Chemko wrote: >> >> How about the fact that these packets are for T/TCP aka Transactional >> TCP, not regular TCP! RD> Yes. There must be something about T/TCP packets that prevents it RD> from being matched by a regular "-p tcp" option. I don't know much about RD> T/TCP but reading rfc1644 might help at least block them on the firewall. RD> Ramin -- Best regards, Geffrey mailto:g_netfilter@netfids.com