From: <pyoder3@verizon.net>
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: nf_conntrack_tcp_timeout_close value
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:58:30 -0500 (CDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19200036.1321831206651510533.JavaMail.root@vms069.mailsrvcs.net> (raw)
Find something which I did not fully understand but I was able to fix by changing the nf_conntrack_tcp_timeout_close value to 1 or 0.
I had an application connect upto my server via a proxy server. Sometimes we would send a RST to the client which would close the netstat state of the connection but it seems that iptables (ip_conntrack) does not clear the session right away. What you find is
tcp 6 9 CLOSE src=192.168.13.2 dst=10.12.13.14 sport=22052 dport=18292 src=10.12.13.14 dst=192.168.13.2 sport=18292 dport=22052 [ASSURED] use=1
which I find out will remain like this for a 10 second window (set by nf_conntrack_tcp_timeout_close default value)
Normally this is not a problem but the client proxy server is sending up an ACK to our RST packet which will now pass the iptables rule I have for ESTABLISHED connections since it is in the ip_conntrack with the ASSURED flag set. We will then send another RST and again an ACK from the client.
I can stop/prevent this with the above change nf_conntrack_tcp_timeout_close value to 0.
Now my real question is there a reason I should not set that value to 0. The only time I see any mention to the timeout_close value is for a RST packet and I can not think of a reason to keep this in an ASSURED state in the firewall. If setting this to 0 is not the ideal fix any suggestion to another fix is greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Peter
next reply other threads:[~2008-03-27 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-27 20:58 pyoder3 [this message]
2008-03-28 8:03 ` nf_conntrack_tcp_timeout_close value Jozsef Kadlecsik
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-03-27 21:00 pyoder3
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19200036.1321831206651510533.JavaMail.root@vms069.mailsrvcs.net \
--to=pyoder3@verizon.net \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox