From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: hArTh0 hArTh0 Subject: Fwd: Newbie Q: Forcing p2p traffic via one interface on a dual homed system. Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:15:30 +0200 Message-ID: <1bcb81340411290115f7113c6@mail.gmail.com> References: <1bcb81340411281238368cf6b3@mail.gmail.com> <1101692026.10064.32.camel@hubcap.ljm.dom> <1bcb813404112901054f920830@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: hArTh0 hArTh0 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1bcb813404112901054f920830@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: hArTh0 hArTh0 Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:05:32 +0200 Subject: Re: Newbie Q: Forcing p2p traffic via one interface on a dual homed system. To: Jason Opperisano Hmmm I see what you mean. I guess the ipp2p module is normally used to prioritise traffic rather than re-route it. Could some one suggest an appropriate general strategy that I could use solve my original problem i.e. selectively force p2p traffic to traverse ppp1? Regards, H On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 20:33:46 -0500, Jason Opperisano wrote: > On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 15:38, hArTh0 hArTh0 wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > My first post to this group and be warned I am a new linux user ;) > > > > My setup: > > > > -----ISP1---ppp0----Router-----MainPC > > -----ISP2---ppp1-------| > > > > Router ip: 192.168.0.1 > > MainPC ip: 192.168.0.10 > > ppp0: 165.165.89.171 > > ppp1: 165.146.132.124 > > > > What I want to achieve is that all p2p traffic passes through ppp1 > > while everthing else goes through ppp0. > > > > My approach to date: Use http://www.ipp2p.org to mark all p2p packets > > and then attempt to use this mark to get these packets to leave via > > ppp1. > > your question sounds just like: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=netfilter&m=109853391328421&w=2 > > answer is still the same: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=netfilter&m=109866874632386&w=2 > > -j > > -- > "Me lose brain? Uh, oh! Ha ha ha! Why I laugh?" > --The Simpsons > >