On Tue, 11 Jun 2002 09:59:02 -0700 (PDT)
Max Headroom <maxheadroom2323@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Bob,
> Thanks. But, TCP doesn't need a NAT helper
> because only UDP uses an anonymous port
> that the server needs to connect back to
> the client on. The argument is that UDP
> give better performace which is why
> I am trying to get a 2.4 NAT helper for
> Real Player. Anyone know of anyone else
> working on the problem? ICQ would is another
> helper I am looking for. Anyone working on
> that?
> MH
> 

	I know as far as ICQ goes, that a helper won't be made (at least to my
knowledge) since it is a closed protocol.  However, I'm sure there is
someone out there willing to design a helper for all our icq using
friends :)