From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ramin Alidousti Subject: Re: Completely NAT an ISP: A practical possibility? Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 11:20:11 -0400 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.samba.org Message-ID: <20020619152011.GJ26150@cannon.eng.us.uu.net> References: <3D0BBC45.5000807@palaver.net> <200206152233.g5FMXPA27757@Networker.rockstone.co.uk> <20020616001745.N2090@funkyjesus.org> <20020618171543.919DF681A5@engenho.terra.com.br> <20020618185005.GC26150@cannon.eng.us.uu.net> <20020618202115.32CD7C94DF@srv11-sao.terra.com.br> <20020618225058.GC27054@cannon.eng.us.uu.net> <20020619143545.BDDB2680D7@engenho.terra.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020619143545.BDDB2680D7@engenho.terra.com.br> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.samba.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Rodrigo Senra Cc: netfilter@lists.samba.org On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 11:36:33AM -0300, Rodrigo Senra wrote: > |On Tue, 18 Jun 2002 18:50:58 -0400 > |Ramin Alidousti wrote > | about Re: Completely NAT an ISP: A practical possibility?: > > >> On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 05:22:03PM -0300, Rodrigo Senra wrote: > > > > > > Just a small note. FTP is one of the protocols that would break... > > Hi, > could you care to explain me how it would break ? Since it is working > here ;o), I think we are discussing different scenarios I defer this explanation to the documents available about the NAT and FTP. You can start with the netfilter documents on the need for ip_nat_ftp. Also the FTP protocol and more specifically the PORT command would give you what you're looking for. > because of my poor explanation on the matter. No, not at all. Ramin > > But I think I can gain a lot from your explanation. > > TIA, > Senra > -- > Rodrigo Senra > MSc Computer Engineer (GPr Sistemas Ltda) rodsenra@gpr.com.br > http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~921234 (LinUxer 217.243) (ICQ 114477550)