From: Antony Stone <Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk>
To: netfilter@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: VPN behind Linux Firewall
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 17:57:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200206241657.RAA16900@slate.rockstone.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00ff01c21b9e$fafe0790$0327a8c0@kayegee>
On Monday 24 June 2002 5:48 pm, kayegee wrote:
> I have a LINUX firewall protecting my local LAN. I have 2 computers that
> use the Nortel VPN client to connect to my office. I can make the VPN
> connection, but I can't seem to stay connected for more than 10 to 15 min.
> Suddenly the system stops responding. If you look at the VPN icon, only the
> top half of the icon blinks. When things are working properly, both the top
> and bottom half of the VPN icon flash. While this is happening, other
> computers connected to the Internet continue to work without a problem. I
> was looking in /proc/net/ip_conntrack file and notice that I seem to lose
> my connection every time I get an entry like the following in that file:
>
> unknown 50 523 src=192.168.XX.X dst=192.128.166.44 src=192.128.166.44
> dst=XX.XXX.XXX.XX use=1
>
> I'm not sure why I'm getting an unknown packet. I'm also not sure how
> iptables should handle an unknown packet. If anyone can shed some light on
> this subject, I'd greatly appreciate it.
'unknown' in this context simply means that the logging system doesn't know
what to call protocol 50, which is ESP. Therefore I surmise that the Nortel
application is using IPsec.
Are you saying that this entry is *not* present in the connection tracking
table whilst the VPN connection is operational ?
I think it might be interesting to add a logging rule, or use tcpdump /
ethereal etc, to look for UDP packets from source port 500 to source port
500, and see if these appear soon before the connection goes downj ?
UDP 500 is the Internet Key Exchange (IKE) protocol, and the two end systems
might be trying to re-key (although 10-15 minutes is a bit quick), and
something might be blocking that ?
Just a thought.
Antony.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-24 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-24 16:48 VPN behind Linux Firewall kayegee
2002-06-24 16:57 ` Antony Stone [this message]
2002-06-24 17:09 ` Antony Stone
2002-06-24 17:05 ` Rowan Reid
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200206241657.RAA16900@slate.rockstone.co.uk \
--to=antony@soft-solutions.co.uk \
--cc=netfilter@lists.samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox