From: Christian Seberino <seberino@spawar.navy.mil>
To: Antony Stone <Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk>
Cc: netfilter@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: how is this stuff getting thru default deny iptables firewall?....
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 00:14:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020627001418.A13910@spawar.navy.mil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020623080704.YEZE2755.mta05-svc.ntlworld.com@there>; from Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk on Sun, Jun 23, 2002 at 09:07:02AM +0100
> Reverse nat for replying packets is automatic, therefore replies get
> destination natted when they come back in.
This scares me. So you are saying that there are "implicit" NAT
rules for "replying packets" that are immune to iptables DROP rules?!
If a packet is part of an ESTABLISHED tcp connection then it
can by pass an "SSH only" firewall?!??
I *didn't* allow /any/ ESTABLISHED connections on FORWARD
chain?!?!? How is iptables
behaving as though I did!?!?!? This is default hardcoded
behavior for iptables?!?!?
Chris
--
_______________________________________
Dr. Christian Seberino
SPAWAR Systems Center San Diego
Code 2363
53560 Hull Street
San Diego, CA 92152-5001
U.S.A.
Phone: (619) 553-7940
Fax: (619) 553-2836
Email: seberino@spawar.navy.mil
_______________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-27 7:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-22 17:30 how is this stuff getting thru default deny iptables firewall? Christian Seberino
2002-06-22 17:38 ` Antony Stone
2002-06-23 7:13 ` Christian Seberino
2002-06-23 7:53 ` Patrick Schaaf
2002-06-27 7:21 ` Christian Seberino
2002-06-27 7:37 ` Patrick Schaaf
2002-07-09 19:08 ` Christian Seberino
2002-06-23 8:07 ` Antony Stone
2002-06-27 7:14 ` Christian Seberino [this message]
2002-06-27 7:28 ` Patrick Schaaf
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-22 21:43 James T. Moore
2002-06-23 7:13 ` Christian Seberino
2002-07-09 19:43 j davis
2002-07-09 21:41 ` Christian Seberino
2002-07-09 21:43 ` Christian Seberino
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.33.0207101903030.1723-100000@dodobirdy.nestac.com>
2002-07-10 16:34 ` Christian Seberino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020627001418.A13910@spawar.navy.mil \
--to=seberino@spawar.navy.mil \
--cc=Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk \
--cc=netfilter@lists.samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox