From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Antony Stone Subject: Re: detection of the third tcp packet in a tcp connection setup Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 21:06:54 +0100 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.samba.org Message-ID: <20020627200655.VZLE19225.mta07-svc.ntlworld.com@there> References: <20020627194405.GLHF295.mta03-svc.ntlworld.com@there> <20020627195742.GA31466@cannon.eng.us.uu.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20020627195742.GA31466@cannon.eng.us.uu.net> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.samba.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: netfilter@lists.samba.org On Thursday 27 June 2002 8:57 pm, Ramin Alidousti wrote: > If I'm not wrong you can always send data even in SYN and SYN/ACK. > Like Patrick said the default options in the socket interface might > not do it but I thought I saw some tweaking in one of Richard Steven's > (god bless his soul) books to push traffic in SYN packets. Is that an interesting way to get round packet filtering firewalls ? Send enough data (eg an http request) in a SYN packet so that the application does the dirty work for you, even if the packet filter isn't going to allow the connection to get ESTABLISHED ? Or do you have to fiddle with the receiving socket too in order for it to cope with this ? Antony.