From: Patrick Schaaf <bof@bof.de>
To: Joe Patterson <jpatterson@asgardgroup.com>
Cc: netfilter@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: detection of the third tcp packet in a tcp connection setup
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 22:11:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020627221141.G2890@oknodo.bof.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <NJEFLNJDIFFNMHDEBKMJEEJBDOAA.jpatterson@asgardgroup.com>; from jpatterson@asgardgroup.com on Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 03:50:49PM -0400
> Other than order I don't see any way to distinguish the first ack from
> the 100th.
If perfect recognition is neccessary, a suitable in-kernel module would
be able to remember there are sequence numbers from the SYNs (conntrack
already does that), and pinpoint that ACK by looking at its sequence
numbers, seeing that they are next to the one from the SYNs.
> Now, you could say that if the tcp data length is greater than zero, then
> the packet is either *not* valid, or is *not* the third packet (although
> there was at one point a proposed tcp-like protocol that had data in the
> third packet, to keep down latency on short duration sessions, but I believe
> it's still considered evil in tcp-land).
That was called T/TCP, there were some problems hindering wide deploying,
if I remember correctly - and it would have permitted sending data already
along with the SYN packets, the third ACK having also a FIN, and thus
a full request/response connection in three packets.
best regards
Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-27 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-27 18:27 detection of the third tcp packet in a tcp connection setup Ramin Alidousti
2002-06-27 18:36 ` Antony Stone
2002-06-27 18:52 ` Antony Stone
2002-06-27 19:08 ` Ramin Alidousti
2002-06-27 18:53 ` Patrick Schaaf
2002-06-27 19:04 ` Ramin Alidousti
2002-06-27 18:57 ` Maciej Soltysiak
2002-06-27 19:10 ` Joe Patterson
2002-06-27 19:30 ` Antony Stone
2002-06-27 19:44 ` Patrick Schaaf
2002-06-27 19:39 ` Ramin Alidousti
2002-06-27 19:49 ` Maciej Soltysiak
2002-06-27 21:41 ` Matthew G. Marsh
2002-06-27 19:44 ` Antony Stone
2002-06-27 19:57 ` Ramin Alidousti
2002-06-27 20:06 ` Antony Stone
2002-06-27 20:31 ` Ramin Alidousti
2002-06-27 20:36 ` Antony Stone
2002-06-27 19:50 ` Joe Patterson
2002-06-27 20:11 ` Patrick Schaaf [this message]
2002-06-27 21:23 ` James Mello
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020627221141.G2890@oknodo.bof.de \
--to=bof@bof.de \
--cc=jpatterson@asgardgroup.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox