From: Guillaume Devoyon <guillaume.devoyon@integro-networks.com>
To: netfilter@lists.samba.org
Subject: PREROUTING AND SECURITY
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 10:17:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020628101729.37c34c29.guillaume.devoyon@integro-networks.com> (raw)
hello,
on the firewall at my office, i do preroutings tasks in order to forward ports.
In order to do that, i use the following rule :
/sbin/iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -s $CLIENT_PUBLIC_IP -p tcp -i $EXTERNAL_INTERFACE\
--dport 80 -j DNAT --to $INTERNAL_MACHINE:80
As you can see, I use the "-s" option to allow only one person to use my forwarding port.
Yesterday, I had an attack on the firewall .
I had this in my /var/log/messages :
Jun 27 14:44:39 cofw01 kernel: FIREWALL_80IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:30:48:51:08:f0:00:20:6f:11:34:7b:08:00 SRC=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx DST=192.168.1.2 LEN=48 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=115 ID=47214 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=3033 DPT=80 WINDOW=8192 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0
Jun 27 14:51:49 cofw01 kernel: eth0: card reports no resources.
Jun 27 14:51:49 cofw01 last message repeated 15 times
Jun 27 14:51:49 cofw01 kernel: eth0: Too much work at interrupt, status=0x4050.
Jun 27 14:51:49 cofw01 kernel: eth0: card reports no resources.
Jun 27 14:51:49 cofw01 last message repeated 19 times
Jun 27 14:51:49 cofw01 kernel: eth0: Too much work at interrupt, status=0x4050.
Jun 27 14:51:49 cofw01 kernel: eth0: card reports no resources.
Jun 27 14:51:49 cofw01 kernel: eth0: Too much work at interrupt, status=0x4050.
Jun 27 14:51:49 cofw01 kernel: eth0: Too much work at interrupt, status=0x4050.
Jun 27 14:51:49 cofw01 kernel: eth0: card reports no resources.
Jun 27 14:51:49 cofw01 last message repeated 8 times
Jun 27 14:51:49 cofw01 kernel: eth0: Too much work at interrupt, status=0x4050
so i saw that xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx had attacked my firewall.
After this i had to reboot my firewall
1) how is it possible that my firewall switched of my eth0 card ?
Is it because I do a log of this translation rule ? (made my system heavy if there are many connections ?)
Is it because for others rules i do an reject instead of an drop ?
Next, I had a look at my apache server behind the firewall, and I found the following messages in my /var/log/messages
Jun 27 14:51:24 coupf01 kernel: eth0: card reports no resources.
Jun 27 14:51:24 coupf01 kernel: eth0: Too much work at interrupt, status=0x4050.
whow !!
the attack had also touched my server behind the firewall..
How is it possible ? I put an "-s" option in my prerouting..
Is it enough or should I put an drop rule for others connections? (other than my client : -s $CLIENT_PUBLIC_IP)
Guillaume Devoyon
next reply other threads:[~2002-06-28 8:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-28 8:17 Guillaume Devoyon [this message]
2002-06-28 11:55 ` PREROUTING AND SECURITY Matthew Hellman
2002-06-28 14:45 ` Ed Street
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020628101729.37c34c29.guillaume.devoyon@integro-networks.com \
--to=guillaume.devoyon@integro-networks.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox