Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guillaume Devoyon <guillaume.devoyon@integro-networks.com>
To: netfilter@lists.samba.org
Subject: PREROUTING AND SECURITY
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 10:17:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020628101729.37c34c29.guillaume.devoyon@integro-networks.com> (raw)

hello,

on the firewall at my office, i do preroutings tasks in order to forward ports.
In order to do that, i use the following rule :

/sbin/iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -s $CLIENT_PUBLIC_IP -p tcp -i $EXTERNAL_INTERFACE\
 --dport 80 -j DNAT --to $INTERNAL_MACHINE:80

As you can see, I use the "-s" option  to allow only  one person to use my forwarding port.

Yesterday, I had an attack on the firewall .
I had this in my /var/log/messages :


Jun 27 14:44:39 cofw01 kernel: FIREWALL_80IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:30:48:51:08:f0:00:20:6f:11:34:7b:08:00 SRC=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx DST=192.168.1.2 LEN=48 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=115 ID=47214 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=3033 DPT=80 WINDOW=8192 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 
Jun 27 14:51:49 cofw01 kernel: eth0: card reports no resources.
Jun 27 14:51:49 cofw01 last message repeated 15 times
Jun 27 14:51:49 cofw01 kernel: eth0: Too much work at interrupt, status=0x4050.
Jun 27 14:51:49 cofw01 kernel: eth0: card reports no resources.
Jun 27 14:51:49 cofw01 last message repeated 19 times
Jun 27 14:51:49 cofw01 kernel: eth0: Too much work at interrupt, status=0x4050.
Jun 27 14:51:49 cofw01 kernel: eth0: card reports no resources.
Jun 27 14:51:49 cofw01 kernel: eth0: Too much work at interrupt, status=0x4050.
Jun 27 14:51:49 cofw01 kernel: eth0: Too much work at interrupt, status=0x4050.
Jun 27 14:51:49 cofw01 kernel: eth0: card reports no resources.
Jun 27 14:51:49 cofw01 last message repeated 8 times
Jun 27 14:51:49 cofw01 kernel: eth0: Too much work at interrupt, status=0x4050

so i saw that xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx had attacked my firewall.

After this i had to reboot my firewall

1) how is it possible that my firewall switched of my eth0 card ? 
   Is it because I do a log of this translation rule ? (made my system heavy if there are many connections ?)
   Is it because for others rules i do an reject instead of an drop ?

Next, I had a look at my apache server behind the firewall, and I found the following messages in my /var/log/messages

Jun 27 14:51:24 coupf01 kernel: eth0: card reports no resources.
Jun 27 14:51:24 coupf01 kernel: eth0: Too much work at interrupt, status=0x4050.


whow !!
the attack had also touched my server behind the firewall..
How is it possible ? I put an "-s" option in my prerouting..
Is it enough or should I put an drop rule for others connections? (other than my client : -s $CLIENT_PUBLIC_IP)


Guillaume Devoyon


             reply	other threads:[~2002-06-28  8:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-06-28  8:17 Guillaume Devoyon [this message]
2002-06-28 11:55 ` PREROUTING AND SECURITY Matthew Hellman
2002-06-28 14:45   ` Ed Street

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020628101729.37c34c29.guillaume.devoyon@integro-networks.com \
    --to=guillaume.devoyon@integro-networks.com \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox