From: Ramin Alidousti <ramin@cannon.eng.us.uu.net>
To: George Vieira <GeorgeV@citadelcomputer.com.au>
Cc: "'R. Sterenborg'" <rsterenborg@xs4all.nl>, netfilter@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Unable to apply pptp patch
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 08:29:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020703122933.GA32116@cannon.eng.us.uu.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200FAA488DE0D41194F10010B597610D2BA1F6@JUPITER>
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 07:18:29PM +1000, George Vieira wrote:
> Yes limitation is to all versions and it's not a netfilter problem.. it's
> the design of PPTP which was microsoft big stuff up from memory. The design
> didn't allow multiple connections from the same source..
And it wasn't supposed to. Not being an M$ lover, but:
pptp is a standard based on Cisco's L2F and Microsoft's L2TP. Its
design is meant as an extention of ppp where the remote end of the
ppp session is not the NAS/RAS (at the edge) but on the LNS (somewhere
within the IP cloud). pptp has some very nice applications, and in a
sense it can be considered as a VPN solution like any other tunneling
solution ipip/gre/... but one has never claimed that it's a secure VPN
solution like IPsec.
So, in short, don't blame something when using the wrong technology
as a wrong solution.
Ramin
> Use a Linux to Linux VPN and you can route the whole network back and
> forth....
>
> Also PPTP isn't the best VPN but is widely used due to the Micro$oft support
> for it..
>
> I'd rather use IPSEC if I can only just compile my damn kernel right for
> once.. (it's been a while)..
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-03 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-03 9:18 Unable to apply pptp patch George Vieira
2002-07-03 9:25 ` Antony Stone
2002-07-03 19:01 ` Ross Vandegrift
2002-07-03 19:12 ` IPsec & FreeS/WAN Antony Stone
2002-07-04 17:59 ` Ross Vandegrift
2002-07-04 18:28 ` Antony Stone
2002-07-03 9:34 ` Unable to apply pptp patch R. Sterenborg
2002-07-03 9:49 ` Antony Stone
2002-07-03 15:18 ` Joe Patterson
2002-07-03 12:29 ` Ramin Alidousti [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-07-03 9:29 George Vieira
2002-07-03 1:08 Rowan Reid
2002-07-03 7:22 ` R. Sterenborg
2002-07-03 15:43 ` Rowan Reid
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020703122933.GA32116@cannon.eng.us.uu.net \
--to=ramin@cannon.eng.us.uu.net \
--cc=GeorgeV@citadelcomputer.com.au \
--cc=netfilter@lists.samba.org \
--cc=rsterenborg@xs4all.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox