From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rohan Almeida Subject: Re: patch-o-matic: newnat and h323 Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 17:47:19 +0530 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <20020925174719.2aa01de2.arc_of_descent@gmx.net> References: <3D8DF73A.7020408@iol.it> <003e01c26263$bcbef230$8201a8c0@lw1dqwin> <02af01c2647a$d3f37250$6e69690a@rimas> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <02af01c2647a$d3f37250$6e69690a@rimas> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org "Rimas" thus wrote: > What "patch-o-matic" patches I have to install for "newnat" and "h323" > patches on kernel 2.4.19? HI, I had posted this earlier o I used the following patches of pom ahesp-static.patch arptables.patch config-cleanup.patch conntrack+nat-helper-unregister.patch conntrack.patch dscp.patch DSCP.patch ecn.patch ECN.patch helper.patch ip_conntrack_protocol_destroy.patch ip_conntrack_protocol_unregister.patch local-nat.patch macro-trailing-semicolon-fix.patch nat-export_symbols.patch nat-memoryleak-fix.patch netfilter-arp.patch z-newnat16.patch eggdrop-conntrack.patch h323-conntrack-nat.patch pptp-conntrack-nat.patch I expereinced problems with the z-newnat16.patch, but the above sequence works fine with me. Most important, remember "not" to apply the connmark patch I don't know why, maybe somebody can clarify this. -- arc_of_descent