From: Antony Stone <Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk>
To: "netfilter@lists" <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: Purely NAT
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:44:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200210281444.g9SEime08636@vulcan.rissington.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <005401c27e43$73946990$0bc8c80a@dolphin>
On Monday 28 October 2002 5:32 am, yenjet.chan@eglobal.com.my wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is my first post to the list, so please bare with me.
> I have a requirement here. Is there possible to create a purely NAT
> iptables rules for certain IP addresses?
No. You can turn off stateful inspection by not loading or compiling the
connection tracking support, but you cannot use it for some addresses but not
others.
> What I means here is I want to enable stateful filtering for most of the
> all of the users except certain IP address/subnet. Stateful filtering is
> good sometime, bu not all the time, when you really want to do portscaning
> activities from a machine that sit behind the firewall.
How much memory is in the netfilter machine / what size is your conntrack
table / how many connections are you generating with your portscans for this
to be a problem ?
Maybe it would help if you compile conntrack as a module and then you can
unload it when you want to empty the connection tracking table ? (This will
unload *all* the entries at the same time, though).
Antony.
--
The first ninety percent of an engineering project takes ninety percent
of the time, and the last ten percent takes the remaining ninety percent.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-28 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-28 5:32 Purely NAT Jet (jchan@trusecure.com)
2002-10-28 14:44 ` Antony Stone [this message]
2002-10-28 18:37 ` Anthony Liu
2002-10-28 18:43 ` Antony Stone
2002-10-29 2:18 ` Jet (jchan@trusecure.com)
2002-10-29 4:43 ` Alexey Talikov
2002-10-29 5:26 ` Jet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200210281444.g9SEime08636@vulcan.rissington.net \
--to=antony@soft-solutions.co.uk \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox