From: bauer@mit.edu
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: SNAT in OUTPUT chain of the nat table question?
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 19:37:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030109003721.GA26207@mit.edu> (raw)
Is there a good reason that I am unable to conceive of at the
moment why SNAT is not a valid target in the OUTPUT chain of the
nat table?
Thanks,
Steve
next reply other threads:[~2003-01-09 0:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-09 0:37 bauer [this message]
2003-01-08 17:11 ` SNAT in OUTPUT chain of the nat table question? Ranjeet Shetye
2003-01-09 1:29 ` Athan
2003-01-09 2:36 ` Joel Newkirk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030109003721.GA26207@mit.edu \
--to=bauer@mit.edu \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox