From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Alexander W. Janssen" Subject: Re: What does this mean? Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 18:02:41 +0100 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <20030305170241.GC12124@ynfonatic.de> References: <1046358409.11465.23.camel@raylinux.internal> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="da4uJneut+ArUgXk" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Netfilter Mailinglist --da4uJneut+ArUgXk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 04:48:30PM +0100, Maciej Soltysiak wrote: > Note, some routers outthere are not ECN aware and violate RFC 3168 by > dropping these packets. This causes interoperability problems, which > should be resolved by vendors. At http://urchin.earth.li/cgi-bin/ecn.pl?output=3Dip is a list with routers= with are known to violate ECN. There is even a perl-script around wich uses the --remove-ecn feature of the ECN target to create rules based on that list of IP-addresses. Quite nice, since it sorts out the problem locally - but not = in a global sense. Call it self-defense. =20 > > Ray > Maciej Alex --=20 "Mr Data, when I said 'Fire at Will', I didn't mean for you to be so litera= l." Instructions for use of this post: Insert tounge in cheek. Read as normal. --da4uJneut+ArUgXk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Weitere Infos: siehe http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAj5mLbEACgkQEMMZKORQoYJv3QCfRLUAwR3hDOBHEQ3aY7Bb/0Ak oFwAoIje0nHiyaSJMDNMf87ywema9kR7 =WDOR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --da4uJneut+ArUgXk--