From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Kelly Setzer <Kelly.Setzer@placemark.com>
Subject: Re: Unassigned Networks List
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 08:07:03 -0600
Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org
Message-ID: <20030308140703.GB2652@placemark.com>
References: <NGBBIFPIJNDPMFBPKBPGOEJIDKAA.NetFilter-Users@Compucenter.org> <000701c2e53d$72cc42b0$026410ac@honor> <1047106127.2050.56.camel@runabout.noc.starken.com> <20030308130350.01e2c6ed.arnt@c2i.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030308130350.01e2c6ed.arnt@c2i.net>
Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org
List-Help: <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
	<mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: <netfilter.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
	<mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org

On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 01:03:50PM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On 08 Mar 2003 00:48:47 -0600, 
> Daniel Wittenberg <daniel-wittenberg@starken.com> wrote in message 
> <1047106127.2050.56.camel@runabout.noc.starken.com>:
> 
> > firewall, so we couldn't ping the provider.  I subsequently got in an
> > "discussion" with their CTO about RFC 1918 on how it's probably not
> > good to be using private IP's to route public traffic, at least IMHO.
> 
> ..such discussions are better taken in public, so the hotshot can
> show off his alledged competence...  ;-)

When @home was just getting off the ground, they used to expose 10/8
addresses.  I was talking to a first or second level network engineer,
and he *INSISTED* that 10/8 has been assigned to @home.

ha

Kelly