Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Newkirk <netfilter@newkirk.us>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: iptables wishes
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 03:41:48 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200304010341.48281.netfilter@newkirk.us> (raw)

I haven't started a new thread here in ages, and this is something I've 
been toying with for a while.  With the recent announcement of a 
feature-freeze on iptables 1.2.8, this seemed a reasonable time to start 
this thread.  (targeting later releases, obviously, and hoping to spark 
some constructive discussion :^)

I was curious to hear what people might have as a 'wishlist' for 
iptables/netfilter capabilities.  Every once in a while something comes 
up here that simply doesn't seem to have a good solution.

My hope is that many of our personal wishes may already be possible, and 
by voicing them someone who has a solution may post it.  And for any 
that don't presently have an answer, perhaps someone will be inspired to 
create one.

Personally I have four:

1 - revamped LOG entry format, especially cleaning up MAC.

2 - completely separate netfilter logging from kernel log streams.  (not 
just redirecting infrequently-used kernel streams, but actual dedicated 
netfilter streams)

3 - Ability to match "original DestinationIP" of a DNATted packet in 
subsequent chains.  Useful with a single physical interface but multiple 
IPs bound to it.

4 - addition of support for a REM field in rules.  Would do nothing 
whatsoever except print the specified REMark text at the end of the rule 
in -L listings.  Something like:
iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 22 -s a.b.c.d -j ACCEPT -REM JoelSSH
So that a -L listing could be easier & quicker to decipher sometimes.  It 
would also allow "iptables -L -v -n | grep Joel" to list only rules, in 
all chains, with "Joel" in the comment.


j




             reply	other threads:[~2003-04-01  8:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-01  8:41 Joel Newkirk [this message]
2003-04-01 10:17 ` iptables wishes Martin Josefsson
2003-04-01 15:13   ` Joel Newkirk
2003-04-06  3:57 ` AW: " Michael Schoen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-01  9:48 mailinglists
2003-04-01 14:32 ` Ivano Proietti Mucci
2003-04-01 15:35   ` Joel Newkirk
2003-04-01  9:58 Michael Klinteberg
2003-04-01 14:22 ` Joel Newkirk
2003-04-02 16:54 Alex McCubbin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200304010341.48281.netfilter@newkirk.us \
    --to=netfilter@newkirk.us \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox