From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnt Karlsen Subject: Re: Bridge+Bandwidth Control Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 01:54:18 +0200 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <20030412015418.3dc213da.arnt@c2i.net> References: <000d01c2ffbd$947bac30$010aa8c0@crz2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <000d01c2ffbd$947bac30$010aa8c0@crz2> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org On Fri, 11 Apr 2003 02:02:01 +0200, <000d01c2ffbd$947bac30$010aa8c0@crz2>: > Hi! > > I was trying to implement traffic control on a linux > bridge. Basically, I'll need to allocate designated bandwidth > to various services while the rest get throttled. > > Eg. on a 10MBit bandwidth. > http/ftp will get 128K > while the rest (smtp/POP3) will get 64K. > Whatever traffic passing through the bridge > in one direction must not exceed 192K. > > To my dismay, I realised that firewall marking classifier > will not work under bridging mode. > > So right now I'm kind of stuck because of that. > > Can someone tell me whether if I can implement something like > the above? ..my first throttle box hangs an ip-less bridge outside my isp clients firewall, (to control bandwidth for his 802.11 linked customers), how is your setup ? -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case.