From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jun Sun Subject: Re: Any holes in this firewall script? Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 22:05:51 -0700 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <20030603220551.A2672@gateway.junsun.net> References: <20030603180849.B2402@gateway.junsun.net> <1054702862.2273.6.camel@india> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1054702862.2273.6.camel@india>; from dharmu@nsecure.net on Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 10:30:31AM +0530 Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Dharmendra.T" Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 10:30:31AM +0530, Dharmendra.T wrote: > hi, > > I just don't see any firewalling (blocking) in the script. You are > simply allowing everything. Define clear rule like block all and allow > only wanted ports. > The default policy is set to "DROP" for the filter table. Jun