Re: iptables and wifi access point

[Arnt Karlsen <arnt@c2i.net>]

On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 08:04:18 +1000, 
"George Vieira" <georgev@citadelcomputer.com.au> wrote in message 
<09B04A55822EFF4DA48D2E0BB2941D4A15BFD0@wardrive.citadelcomputer.com.au
>:

> 1. Security = Forget WEP (or even 128bit WEP.. it sucks.). Use IPSEC
> tunnels over wifi. 

..ok, a dumb question: which tunnelling gives best signal security 
per cpu omph expenditure?

> 4. Remember in some/most/all countries that subleasing internet
> access is illegal without a carrier license (it is in Australia, dunno
> about anywhere else)..

..huh?  I thought it was the isp's who put stuff like that in 
their service contracts?  
(Usually to protect their own network and business.)

..and, logging _is_ wise, so you can show "who did what when", 
whenever the cops etc get nosy.  

.._after_ they produce the search warrant, of course.  ;-)

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.