From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ramin Dousti Subject: Re: dns replies (udp) blocked but why ? Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 09:36:41 -0400 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <20030825133641.GA28045@cannon.eng.us.uu.net> References: <000101c36b08$754459f0$d90315ac@rsrc.be.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000101c36b08$754459f0$d90315ac@rsrc.be.local> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Tom Van Overbeke Cc: "Netfilter (E-mail)" On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 02:57:35PM +0200, Tom Van Overbeke wrote: > Hi, > > I'm seeing a lot of these messages in my iptables logs lately: > > Aug 25 14:46:21 dobermann kernel: -drop_the_rest-IN= OUT=eth1 SRC=172.21.3.1 > DST=172.21.3.10 LEN=62 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=0 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=53 > DPT=3412 LEN=42 > > > however, the iptables config should accept it: > > i have this rule on the firewall (which is also the dns server, hence the > 'INPUT') > > $IPTABLES -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT > $IPTABLES -A INPUT -p udp -s 172.21.0.0/16 --source-port > 024:65535 --destination-port 53 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT I can't understand the topology of your network and what 172.21.0.0/16 should represent but a server to server query might be from port 53. Why are you filtering based on the source port? > > the 172.21.3.10 is the only one causing problems, i noticed howerver that > this is udp, whereas most dns related traffic i can see is tcp. Most DNS traffic you see should be UDP though. Why are you seeing more TCP than UDP? > could it be a connection tracking problem ? If 172.21.3.10 is too slow in replying and the reply time exceeds the UDP conntrack timeout you'd see this behaviour. Maybe that's the reason. Ramin > > > > thx, > > > Tom.