Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ramin Dousti <ramin@cannon.eng.us.uu.net>
To: Peter Marshall <peter.marshall@caris.com>
Cc: Daniel Chemko <dchemko@smgtec.com>,
	Ramin Dousti <ramin@cannon.eng.us.uu.net>,
	Thorsten Scherf <tscherf@web.de>,
	netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Nat with a dynamic IP
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 15:17:43 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030905191743.GC2100@cannon.eng.us.uu.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <03a601c373d5$c0236800$49caa8c0@caris.priv>

Most of the time the utilities which assign you a dynamic IP address,
have a post-processing hook. You can use this hook to correct you
iptables rules...

Ramin

On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 02:47:18PM -0300, Peter Marshall wrote:

> LOL.  I did not say it was possibel. I was looking for a way to do it.  I
> guess I am not as concerened with getting it to work with multiple external
> interfaces ....  But mostly with the second part of my question ( which by
> the way was ...)
> 
> "More importantly, what about trying to connect directly to the
> firewall from an external address"
> 
> I guess what I am really getting at is that if I set up DNAT the way
> suggested  (see below) then I am not sure how I would be able to ssh to both
> the firewall and a box inside the firewall.  Is the only way to do this to
> ssh to the firewall and then ssh to a box inside the firewall ?
> 
> ( this was the suggestion.  btw, I am not using a mail server, it was just
> in the solution)
> iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 25 -i $EXT_DEV -j DNAT
>     --to-destination $SMTP_SERVER
> 
> My setup would be something like this
> iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 22 -i$EXT_DEV -j DNAT
>        --to-destination $InternalIPofFirewall
> ( this would direct all ssh connections on port 22 to the firewall)
> 
> Is the only other possibility (other than sshing to the firewall first and
> then to the internal box) to have another port listen on a high port, and
> set up my internal box to listen on that high port for ssh ???
> 
> 
> Thanks again, and sorry for the long confusing email ....
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Daniel Chemko" <dchemko@smgtec.com>
> To: "Ramin Dousti" <ramin@cannon.eng.us.uu.net>; "Peter Marshall"
> <peter.marshall@caris.com>
> Cc: "Thorsten Scherf" <tscherf@web.de>; <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
> Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 2:16 PM
> Subject: RE: Nat with a dynamic IP
> 
> 
> > Damn, guys, if you could set me up with a fantastic script that can do
> > multiple DHCP subscriptions on a single NIC, I could throw away my all
> > 4-port NIC's. I'll hear offers for the cards 'after' I get this script
> > :-)
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ramin Dousti [mailto:ramin@cannon.eng.us.uu.net]
> > Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 10:11 AM
> > To: Peter Marshall
> > Cc: Thorsten Scherf; netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
> > Subject: Re: Nat with a dynamic IP
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 11:36:09AM -0300, Peter Marshall wrote:
> >
> > > That is a pretty good solution for the SNAT.  I never thought about
> > MASQ.
> > > However .... I am not sure if the DNAT is the best solution ....  WHat
> > if
> > > you had multiple ip numbers on the external card ....
> >
> > and they're all dynamic? Give us an example...
> >
> > Ramin
> >
> > > More importantly, what about trying to connect directly to the
> > firewall from
> > > an external address.
> >
> >


  reply	other threads:[~2003-09-05 19:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-05 17:16 Nat with a dynamic IP Daniel Chemko
2003-09-05 17:47 ` Peter Marshall
2003-09-05 19:17   ` Ramin Dousti [this message]
2003-09-06  0:34   ` Jim Carter
2003-09-05 19:13 ` Ramin Dousti
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-05 19:23 Daniel Chemko
2003-09-05 19:28 ` Peter Marshall
2003-09-05 13:34 Peter Marshall
2003-09-05 14:05 ` Thorsten Scherf
2003-09-05 14:36   ` Peter Marshall
2003-09-05 17:11     ` Ramin Dousti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030905191743.GC2100@cannon.eng.us.uu.net \
    --to=ramin@cannon.eng.us.uu.net \
    --cc=dchemko@smgtec.com \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    --cc=peter.marshall@caris.com \
    --cc=tscherf@web.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox