From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnt Karlsen Subject: Re: FORWARD rules Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 16:36:56 +0200 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <20030912163656.19b9fb66.arnt@c2i.net> References: <20030910175253.GA2752@linux.local> <1063260568.26703.1.camel@risingsun.penguindia.com> <20030912100957.GA3360@linux.local> <1063363533.879.52.camel@elendil.intranet.cartel-securite.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1063363533.879.52.camel@elendil.intranet.cartel-securite.net> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 12:45:34 +0200, Cedric Blancher wrote in message <1063363533.879.52.camel@elendil.intranet.cartel-securite.net>: > > $IPTABLES -A INPUT -m state --state NEW,ESTABLISHED,RELATED \ ..lose "NEW". > > -j ACCEPT > > Same than below. It's about the same than an policy set to ACCEPT... > > > Can I now change the ACCEPT statement to DROP without any fear? > > Sure. > -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case.