Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>
To: Wouter Vanwalleghem <wouter@belnet.be>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Unable to stop tunnel from being "connection-tracked"
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 12:15:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031003101539.GR5758@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1065093009.24289.193.camel@wouter.fw.belnet.be>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2078 bytes --]

On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 01:10:09PM +0200, Wouter Vanwalleghem wrote:
> hi all,
> 
> I have setup a 6-in-4 tunnel which is giving me head-aches.
> FYI, I use kernel 2.4.21 and iptables 1.2.8.
> 
> As soon as I start using the tunnel the output of "cat
> /proc/net/ip_conntrack" shows a protocol 41 connection between my
> firewall and the IPv4 PoP of the tunnelbroker. 
> OK so far. 

yup.  That's how it is on my 6to4 tunnel gateway, too.

> Thing is that the tunnel "dies" as soon as the connection has
> disappeared from the connection tracking table.
> 
> After some research I followed a suggestion to keep the tunnel from
> being connection tracked.

impossible with stock iptables. 

> However, the following iptables rules do not prevent the tunnel from
> popping up in the connection tracking table:
> 
> 
> #####------------ IPv6 tunnel to SixXS-----
> iptables -A INPUT -p 41 -s tunnelserver.concepts-ict.net -j ACCEPT
> iptables -A OUTPUT -p 41 -d tunnelserver.concepts-ict.net -j ACCEPT
> iptables -A INPUT -p icmp --icmp-type echo-request -s
> tunnelserver.concepts-ict.net -j ACCEPT
> iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING --protocol ! 41 -s 192.168.100.0/24 -o
> ppp0 -j MASQUERADE

Why should this prevent connection tracking from tracking the tunnel?
Connection tracking always tracks all packets, as described in the docs.

It's just a quesion on whether you want to use the information provided
by conntrack or not.  And this totally depends on your ruleset.

> Anybody have a clue?

This has to be somehow related to your local setup/configuration.  I am
running 6to4 tunnels on a lot of firewalls without any problems.

> kind regards,
> Wouter

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>             http://www.netfilter.org/
============================================================================
  "Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early
   architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going
   on while IP was being designed."                    -- Paul Vixie

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

      parent reply	other threads:[~2003-10-03 10:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-02 11:10 Unable to stop tunnel from being "connection-tracked" Wouter Vanwalleghem
2003-10-02 13:52 ` Ramin Dousti
2003-10-02 19:35   ` Wouter Vanwalleghem
2003-10-03 10:16     ` Harald Welte
2003-10-03 19:43     ` Ramin Dousti
2003-10-03 20:02       ` Wouter Vanwalleghem
2003-10-03 10:15 ` Harald Welte [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031003101539.GR5758@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org \
    --to=laforge@netfilter.org \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    --cc=wouter@belnet.be \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox