From: Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>
To: Wouter Vanwalleghem <wouter@belnet.be>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Unable to stop tunnel from being "connection-tracked"
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 12:15:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031003101539.GR5758@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1065093009.24289.193.camel@wouter.fw.belnet.be>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2078 bytes --]
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 01:10:09PM +0200, Wouter Vanwalleghem wrote:
> hi all,
>
> I have setup a 6-in-4 tunnel which is giving me head-aches.
> FYI, I use kernel 2.4.21 and iptables 1.2.8.
>
> As soon as I start using the tunnel the output of "cat
> /proc/net/ip_conntrack" shows a protocol 41 connection between my
> firewall and the IPv4 PoP of the tunnelbroker.
> OK so far.
yup. That's how it is on my 6to4 tunnel gateway, too.
> Thing is that the tunnel "dies" as soon as the connection has
> disappeared from the connection tracking table.
>
> After some research I followed a suggestion to keep the tunnel from
> being connection tracked.
impossible with stock iptables.
> However, the following iptables rules do not prevent the tunnel from
> popping up in the connection tracking table:
>
>
> #####------------ IPv6 tunnel to SixXS-----
> iptables -A INPUT -p 41 -s tunnelserver.concepts-ict.net -j ACCEPT
> iptables -A OUTPUT -p 41 -d tunnelserver.concepts-ict.net -j ACCEPT
> iptables -A INPUT -p icmp --icmp-type echo-request -s
> tunnelserver.concepts-ict.net -j ACCEPT
> iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING --protocol ! 41 -s 192.168.100.0/24 -o
> ppp0 -j MASQUERADE
Why should this prevent connection tracking from tracking the tunnel?
Connection tracking always tracks all packets, as described in the docs.
It's just a quesion on whether you want to use the information provided
by conntrack or not. And this totally depends on your ruleset.
> Anybody have a clue?
This has to be somehow related to your local setup/configuration. I am
running 6to4 tunnels on a lot of firewalls without any problems.
> kind regards,
> Wouter
--
- Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org> http://www.netfilter.org/
============================================================================
"Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early
architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going
on while IP was being designed." -- Paul Vixie
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-03 10:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-02 11:10 Unable to stop tunnel from being "connection-tracked" Wouter Vanwalleghem
2003-10-02 13:52 ` Ramin Dousti
2003-10-02 19:35 ` Wouter Vanwalleghem
2003-10-03 10:16 ` Harald Welte
2003-10-03 19:43 ` Ramin Dousti
2003-10-03 20:02 ` Wouter Vanwalleghem
2003-10-03 10:15 ` Harald Welte [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031003101539.GR5758@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org \
--to=laforge@netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=wouter@belnet.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox