From: Alistair Tonner <Alistair@nerdnet.ca>
To: "Kleiner, Peter" <kleinerp@smbmicro.com>,
"'netfilter@lists.netfilter.org'" <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: Help with port forwarding
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 13:04:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200310241304.41754.Alistair@nerdnet.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <FDAFEC98D318F74CA26B5A26F2B4965227C54A@exchange.jfctechnologies.com>
On October 24, 2003 09:34 am, Kleiner, Peter wrote:
Just a bizarre thought, since you seem to be looking at forwarded traffic not
getting out .. .did you check /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward to ensure it
exists on PC2 and contains 1? -- not sure why but I have seen an install
where it did NOT exist. -- rebuilt the kernel to fix it .. .so I suppose the
kernel that was in place was not properly configured. *shrugs* ... I'm only
asking since it wasn't said.. and sometimes the simple answer is the fast
one.
> Thus spake Mark E. Donaldson:
> > Peter - I don't see anything obvious in the script that could be
> > problematic. What do you mean by "port forwarding not
> > working"?
>
> When I run the script as shown, I can telnet through any of the filtered
> ports (110, 143, 443) on the working PC, but not on the not-working PC.
>
> > Are you
> > getting any error messages?
>
> None whatsoever. I tried logging the traffic, but nothing showed up.
> Interestingly, when I had logging on, it showed various attempts at
> port 135:
> Oct 21 16:55:45 gw kernel: IN=eth1 OUT=
> MAC=00:30:21:07:ef:94:00:02:b9:91:7d:40:08:00 SRC=63.67.218.114
> DST=XX.XX.4.7 LEN=64 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=115 ID=44619 DF PROTO=TCP
> SPT=4168 DPT=135 WINDOW=64240 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0
> Oct 21 16:55:46 gw kernel: IN=eth1 OUT=
> MAC=00:30:21:07:ef:94:00:02:b9:91:7d:40:08:00 SRC=63.67.218.114
> DST=XX.XX.4.7 LEN=64 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=115 ID=44889 DF PROTO=TCP
> SPT=4168 DPT=135 WINDOW=64240 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0
> Oct 21 16:55:46 gw kernel: IN=eth1 OUT=
> MAC=00:30:21:07:ef:94:00:02:b9:91:7d:40:08:00 SRC=63.67.218.114
> DST=XX.XX.4.7 LEN=64 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=115 ID=45129 DF PROTO=TCP
> SPT=4168 DPT=135 WINDOW=64240 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0
> Oct 21 16:59:23 gw kernel: IN=eth1 OUT=
> MAC=00:30:21:07:ef:94:00:02:b9:91:7d:40:08:00 SRC=66.156.169.85
> DST=XX.XX.4.7 LEN=48 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=112 ID=47221 DF PROTO=TCP
> SPT=2180 DPT=135 WINDOW=16384 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0
> Oct 21 16:59:24 gw kernel: IN=eth1 OUT=
> MAC=00:30:21:07:ef:94:00:02:b9:91:7d:40:08:00 SRC=66.156.169.85
> DST=XX.XX.4.7 LEN=48 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=112 ID=47351 DF PROTO=TCP
> SPT=2180 DPT=135 WINDOW=16384 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0
> [sorry for the long text lines]
> But nothing was recorded when I tried to telnet to ports 110, 143 or 443.
>
> > Is translation being performed
> > but the packets
> > are not routed?
>
> I'm not sure how to tell that. Possibly. Running nmap of the public
> address shows:
> Starting nmap V. 3.00 ( www.insecure.org/nmap/ )
> Interesting ports on (XX.XX.4.7):
> (The 1596 ports scanned but not shown below are in state: closed)
> Port State Service
> 22/tcp open ssh
> 25/tcp open smtp
> 110/tcp filtered pop-3
> 143/tcp filtered imap2
> 443/tcp filtered https
>
> > I might be able to generate some ideas here
> > if you can be
> > more specific.
>
> Please let me know what else you need. I am completely baffled. Why would
> the same
> script work on one machine and not the other? That is why I listed the
> lsmod in my
> original post. I wonder if it's something not related to iptables.....?
>
> > By the way, I believe you are meaning to
> > block the Auth
> > protocol (port 113): that being the case, you need to
> > specify TCP and not
> > UDP.
>
> Fixed. Thanks!
>
> Pete
--
Alistair Tonner
nerdnet.ca
Senior Systems Analyst - RSS
Any sufficiently advanced technology will have the appearance of magic.
Lets get magical!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-24 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-24 13:34 Help with port forwarding Kleiner, Peter
2003-10-24 17:04 ` Alistair Tonner [this message]
2003-10-25 4:59 ` Mark E. Donaldson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-27 12:48 Kleiner, Peter
2003-10-24 17:17 Kleiner, Peter
2003-10-25 2:52 ` Herman
2003-10-22 16:41 Kleiner, Peter
2003-10-24 6:03 ` Mark E. Donaldson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200310241304.41754.Alistair@nerdnet.ca \
--to=alistair@nerdnet.ca \
--cc=kleinerp@smbmicro.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox