From: Alistair Tonner <Alistair@nerdnet.ca>
To: Kevin Smith <kevin@perfht.com>,
Netfilter List <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: Noob Question
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 22:26:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200310312226.43276.Alistair@nerdnet.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <NGBBLGFEALDADHNDAAFFGEPJDMAA.kevin@perfht.com>
On October 31, 2003 12:03 pm, Kevin Smith wrote:
> Ok thanks, I think I had to but wasn't 100%. Now I can eliminate that is a
> possibility (Iptables 1.2.8).
> I finished it late last night so I wasn't in the mood for Googling
> anything. but tonight I shall. But I would turn away any tips. ;-)
> Thanks
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 5
> Subject: Re: Noob Question
> From: Ray Leach <raymondl@knowledgefactory.co.za>
> To: Netfilter Mailing List <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
> Organization: Knowledge Factory
> Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 16:25:39 +0200
>
>
> --=-p9AU5830cWaY0P2ToPWv
> Content-Type: text/plain
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 16:13, Kevin Smith wrote:
> > Does IPtables need to be recompiled every time you roll a new kernel?
> > I just compiled 2.4.22 and when my firewall (Shorewall) started, it
> > spit some "device busy" errors with ip_tables.o.=20
> > Kev
>
That error usually is generated when one has both iptables and ipchains in
the tree.
if ipchains loads ... iptables *coughs* and exits stage left.
> No. The kernel source includes (at least as far as I recall) the
> iptables kernel space drivers/programs/libraries.
>
> The userspace tools (the iptables executables used to manage rules) are
> separate, and do not get recompiled every time you recompile the kernel.
>
> The exception would be if you have iptables v0.1.0 (for example)
> userspace programs and in your kernel have iptables v1.2.8 source code,
> then there would be a mismatch, and the userspace programs may be
> incompatible with the kernel modules.
>
> Best to keep them all the same.
> --=20
> --
> Raymond Leach <raymondl@knowledgefactory.co.za>
> Network Support Specialist
> http://www.knowledgefactory.co.za
> "lynx -source http://www.rchq.co.za/raymondl.asc | gpg --import"
> Key fingerprint =3D 7209 A695 9EE0 E971 A9AD 00EE 8757 EE47 F06F FB28
> --
--
Alistair Tonner
nerdnet.ca
Senior Systems Analyst - RSS
Any sufficiently advanced technology will have the appearance of magic.
Lets get magical!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-01 3:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-31 17:03 Noob Question Kevin Smith
2003-11-01 3:26 ` Alistair Tonner [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-31 14:13 Kevin Smith
2003-10-31 14:25 ` Ray Leach
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200310312226.43276.Alistair@nerdnet.ca \
--to=alistair@nerdnet.ca \
--cc=kevin@perfht.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox