From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeffrey Laramie Subject: Re: open ports 25/tcp and 110/tcp Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 19:11:07 -0500 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <200312031911.07628.JALaramie@Loudoun-Fairfax.com> References: <002101c3b9ef$53e5d780$0201a8c0@OurPC> <200312032339.21755.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk> <003d01c3b9f9$4e074380$0201a8c0@OurPC> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <003d01c3b9f9$4e074380$0201a8c0@OurPC> Content-Disposition: inline Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org On Wednesday 03 December 2003 18:58, David F. Strauch wrote: > Yes, Antony this is the case. I have only one WinXP machine that I am > testing with. I'm testing the external interface eth0 and I have unplugged > eth1 from the hub. > > When I nmap -sT -p 25,110 -P0 xx.xx.xx.xx I get the following output form > nmap: > > Starting nmap V. 3.00 ( www.insecure.org/nmap ) > Interesting ports on (67.153.34.147): > Port State Service > 25/tcp open smtp > 110/tcp open pop-3 > > Nmap run completed -- 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 1 second > Why don't you run a packet sniffer on this interface and run the test again. That should show what it is nmap is seeing, if anything. Jeff