Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Antony Stone <Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: open ports 25/tcp and 110/tcp
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 00:39:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200312040039.47118.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200312031928.32914.JALaramie@Loudoun-Fairfax.com>

On Thursday 04 December 2003 12:28 am, Jeffrey Laramie wrote:

> On Wednesday 03 December 2003 19:14, Michael Gale wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > 	Maybe because you are running nmap from a windows box ?
> >
> > Have you tried a windows machine ?
>
> Yes, and it tasted like chicken.
>
>
>
> Seriously, that may be a good point. Make sure there isn't anything running
> on the sending box that might interfere with the test. I've had screwed up
> nmap tests when the sending box filtered certain ports.

This I can understand, but what puzzles me is that David is saying that from 
the same test machine, doing nmap -sT, and telnet xx.xx.xx.xx 25, are giving 
different results.

nmap -sT does a TCP connect, and telnet does a TCP connect, so how is it 
possible for one to say that the port is open, but the other not to show the 
welcome banner?

Antony.

-- 
In science, one tries to tell people
in such a way as to be understood by everyone
something that no-one ever knew before.

In poetry, it is the exact opposite.

 - Paul Dirac

                                                     Please reply to the list;
                                                           please don't CC me.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-12-04  0:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-03 22:46 open ports 25/tcp and 110/tcp David F. Strauch
2003-12-03 23:01 ` Antony Stone
2003-12-03 23:15   ` David F. Strauch
2003-12-03 23:23     ` Antony Stone
2003-12-03 23:34   ` David F. Strauch
     [not found]   ` <002201c3b9f5$c7ee11a0$0201a8c0@OurPC>
2003-12-03 23:39     ` Antony Stone
2003-12-03 23:58       ` David F. Strauch
2003-12-04  0:08         ` Antony Stone
2003-12-04  0:14           ` Michael Gale
2003-12-04  0:28             ` Jeffrey Laramie
2003-12-04  0:37               ` Michael Gale
2003-12-04  1:14                 ` Jeffrey Laramie
2003-12-04  0:39               ` Antony Stone [this message]
2003-12-04  1:27                 ` Jeffrey Laramie
2003-12-04  3:46                 ` David F. Strauch
2003-12-04  0:11         ` Jeffrey Laramie
2003-12-03 23:08 ` Rob Sterenborg
2003-12-03 23:17   ` Antony Stone

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200312040039.47118.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk \
    --to=antony@soft-solutions.co.uk \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox