From: Michael Gale <mgale@utilitran.com>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Best Practices for iptables
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 12:43:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031205124310.4d4417fc.mgale@utilitran.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1070652599.18670.152.camel@tarkus>
What about OUTPUT ?
You should block everything in every direction and then allow what you want per interface.
Michael.
On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 14:29:59 -0500
Ted Kaczmarek <tedkaz@optonline.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 13:09, Antony Stone wrote:
> > On Friday 05 December 2003 5:40 pm, Daniel Chemko wrote:
> >
> > > Best practices:
> > >
> > > WE ARE ALL HUMAN (I hope)
> > >
> > > If you are looking for the best case, you'd want to cover your own
> > > incompetence. Honestly, I work from this rule.
> > > I policy block everything that I haven't allowed explicitly, simply
> > > becausd if you try to build it in reverse, you're almost guaranteed to
> > > miss a lot of important blocks / etc..
> >
> > I agree.
> >
> > Think of it like this:
> >
> > If you block everything, allow what you want, and forget something, then
> > either you or someone you're providing services for will say "this isn't
> > working - can you fix it please?" and you can correct the ruleset to allow
> > the missing service.
> >
> > On the other hand, if you allow everything, and block the things you don't
> > want, then anything you forget about is more likely to be discovered by
> > somebody else on the Internet scanning and probing their way round your IP
> > address/es, and if they find something you forgot to block, chances are they
> > won't tell you :)
> >
> > Therefore correcting mistakes is a whole lot easier if you start from the
> > "deny everything except these..." approach.
> >
> > Antony.
> Any good firewall implementation should implicitly deny everything on
> the INPUT and FORWARD chains. If anyone tells you different they must
> work for Microsoft.
>
> Ted
>
>
--
Michael Gale
Network Administrator
Utilitran Corporation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-05 19:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-05 17:40 Best Practices for iptables Daniel Chemko
2003-12-05 18:09 ` Antony Stone
2003-12-05 19:29 ` Ted Kaczmarek
2003-12-05 19:43 ` Michael Gale [this message]
2003-12-05 21:16 ` Ramin Dousti
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-12-05 20:54 Daniel Chemko
2003-12-05 21:33 ` Antony Stone
2003-12-05 20:52 Gabby James
2003-12-05 14:28 Gabby James
2003-12-05 14:01 Gabby James
2003-12-05 14:11 ` Ray Leach
2003-12-05 15:40 ` Michael H. Warfield
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031205124310.4d4417fc.mgale@utilitran.com \
--to=mgale@utilitran.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox