From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?= Subject: Re: Protecting against DoS Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 19:13:22 +0200 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <20031209171322.GE17221@edu.joroinen.fi> References: <20031209154333.GB17221@edu.joroinen.fi> <20031209090221.413b7286.mgale@utilitran.com> <20031209162820.GC17221@edu.joroinen.fi> <20031209094047.4dbb09f9.mgale@utilitran.com> <20031209165146.GD17221@edu.joroinen.fi> <20031209100650.485e8a4f.mgale@utilitran.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031209100650.485e8a4f.mgale@utilitran.com> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: Michael Gale Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 10:06:50AM -0700, Michael Gale wrote: > Hello, >=20 > You could try using a rate limit -- you could allow a machine to make le= ts say 10 outbound=20 > connections a second and then ... >=20 > Depending on your network policy you could drop or log all other outbound= request. >=20 This is what I'm planning to do.. and this is also the reason I was asking the questions in the original mail :-) -- Pasi K=E4rkk=E4inen =20 ^ . . Linux / - \ Choice.of.the .Next.Generation.