From: horape@tinuviel.compendium.com.ar
To: Antony Stone <Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: DNATing packets sent to the NATing box
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 14:51:45 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031214175144.GB19059@tinuviel.compendium.com.ar> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200312141716.40029.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk>
> > It looks like the proxy is grabbing the packets first and then dropping
> > them directly onto the INPUT chain. Try disabling the proxy and release the
> > bound ports then try it again. Once the packets reach PREROUTING you can
> > DNAT them to another port.
> I could ubnderstand the proxy code managing to grab the packet off the wire
> before netfilter (PREROUTING) sees it, but I don't see how it would then get
> seen by the INPUT chain - as far as I know, it's not possible for a packet to
> reach netfilter's INPUT chain without first going through the PREROUTING
> chain. If a packet bypasses one of these, it will bypass both.
> However, the idea of disabling the proxy, and then seeing if the LOG rules
> show anything different, is a good one.
> How is the proxy connected to the socket? Anything unusual?
The proxy is just a normal udp socket. (socket, bind, poll, recvfrom...)
What I'm doing is an IVR over H.323, the program receives and send rtp
packets until a conference is made, when the conference is made it starts
working as a proxy (ie, it gets the packet with a recvfrom and sends by
other socket with sendto) Nothing strange there.
> Antony
Saludos,
HoraPe
---
Horacio J. Peña
horape@compendium.com.ar
horape@uninet.edu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-14 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-14 13:52 DNATing packets sent to the NATing box horape
2003-12-14 14:28 ` Jeffrey Laramie
[not found] ` <200312140919.04832.JALaramie@Loudoun-Fairfax.com>
2003-12-14 15:26 ` horape
2003-12-14 15:51 ` Jeffrey Laramie
2003-12-14 16:04 ` horape
2003-12-14 16:55 ` Jeffrey Laramie
2003-12-14 17:16 ` Antony Stone
2003-12-14 17:35 ` Jeffrey Laramie
2003-12-14 17:51 ` horape [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-12-14 18:02 horape
2003-12-14 15:39 horape
2003-12-14 0:52 horape
2003-12-14 4:55 ` Joel Newkirk
2003-12-14 8:42 ` Antony Stone
2003-12-14 12:32 ` horape
2003-12-21 4:49 ` horape
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031214175144.GB19059@tinuviel.compendium.com.ar \
--to=horape@tinuviel.compendium.com.ar \
--cc=Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox