From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Antony Stone Subject: Re: Problems with Transparent Proxy using IPTables, Squid and 2.6 kernel Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:51:59 +0000 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <200401081851.59512.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk> References: <6414C408-4208-11D8-AFEE-000393677A36@porchlight.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <6414C408-4208-11D8-AFEE-000393677A36@porchlight.ca> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org On Thursday 08 January 2004 6:28 pm, Peter Schobel wrote: > Dec 24, 2003: patch-o-matic 20031219 (for kernel >= 2.4.18, including > 2.4.23) > Please note that this release still does not yet support the > just-released 2.6.0 kernel. > Expect a so-called 'patch-o-matic-ng' release for 2.6.x support in the > next couple of weeks. > > Does this mean that iptables will not work with 2.6 kernel? This seems > unlikely to me - I think i'm understanding it incorrectly - please > clarify You are correct - it does not mean that iptables won't work with kernel 2.6. It simply means that this version of patch-o-matic will not work with kernel 2.6 (which is understandable, considering that p-o-m patches the kernel...) Antony. -- Abandon hope, all ye who enter here. You'll feel much better about things once you do. Please reply to the list; please don't CC me.