From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sven Schuster Subject: Re: Problems with Transparent Proxy using IPTables, Squid and 2.6 kernel Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 22:45:26 +0100 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <20040108214526.GA18206@zion.homelinux.com> References: <200401082107.37792.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401082107.37792.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org --LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Peter, unfortunately I can't really help solving this problem, but at least I can tell that redirect and transparent proxying _should_ work on a 2.6.0 system cause I've been using it at home since 2.6.0 came out and even at -test stage I had no problems. My box is a RH 9 system with iptables 1.2.8. Sorry to have no more help for you... :( Sven --=20 Linux zion 2.6.1-rc2 #2 Wed Jan 07 13:42:49 CET 2004 i686 athlon i386 GNU/L= inux 22:40:27 up 1 day, 3:45, 2 users, load average: 0.09, 0.05, 0.01 --LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE//c92o4FAdB2PneQRAr8xAJ0YySAxPYV38aNBEIAIbKWLkVX8qwCdEtYf aPEyMtEYhykNXByAhkBVuAI= =UMvc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X--