From: Antony Stone <Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: per-connection byte counts
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 00:31:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200401190031.50360.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000e01c3de21$28bf0440$0300a8c0@indoaksesbno>
On Monday 19 January 2004 12:14 am, bino-psn wrote:
> For me, I will pu another netfilter-box at the same eth backbone as the
> user.
> Put this interface in promiscuous mode.
> and ...... i thing you can check http://ipaudit.sourceforge.net
If this package provides the information you need, why not just run it on the
netfilter machine? What's the need for a separate box?
Antony.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Carlos Carvalho" <carlos@fisica.ufpr.br>
> To: "Adam Rice" <adamrice@ntlworld.com>
> Cc: <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
> Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 3:16 AM
> Subject: Re: per-connection byte counts
>
> > Adam Rice (adamrice@ntlworld.com) wrote on 18 January 2004 14:09:
> > >I'd like to be able to get per-connection byte-counts from the kernel,
>
> so I
>
> > >can create a sort of top program showing what processes and users are
> > >currently using the network and how much. Since I want this to be
>
> something I
>
> > >can keep running all the time, I don't want to do it by snooping the
> > >interface. Is there some way to do this with netfilter? Sadly
> > >/proc/net/ip_conntrack doesn't appear to provide this information.
> >
> > iftop and iptraf give statistics per interface, per machine and per
> > traffic type plus other interesting info. That's all that can be
> > obtained from a firewall since you cannot retrieve user info from
> > another machine. The performance impact is usually negligible.
> >
> > If you want to run the monitor in a multi-user system where users are
> > logged in you can associate the network connections with processes and
> > users but I don't know a program that does it. This is a "me too"...
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
Please reply to the list;
please don't CC me.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-19 0:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-18 14:09 per-connection byte counts Adam Rice
2004-01-18 14:44 ` [despammed] " Andreas Kretschmer
2004-01-18 15:07 ` Antony Stone
2004-01-18 20:16 ` Carlos Carvalho
2004-01-19 0:14 ` bino-psn
2004-01-19 0:31 ` Antony Stone [this message]
2004-01-19 0:50 ` bino-psn
2004-01-19 23:59 ` Ted Kaczmarek
2004-01-19 14:27 ` Nuno Miguel Pais Fernandes
2004-01-20 22:12 ` Adam Rice
2004-01-27 1:56 ` Harald Welte
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200401190031.50360.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk \
--to=antony@soft-solutions.co.uk \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox