Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Antony Stone <Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Apps that try to do net-to-nat
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 20:53:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200401302053.13354.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1075495257.20475.2.camel@jasiiitosh.nexusmgmt.com>

On Friday 30 January 2004 8:40 pm, John A. Sullivan III wrote:

> On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 15:11, Jago Pearce wrote:
> > I'm behind NAT at work and I need to connect to home, which is also
> > behind NAT.
> >
> > What programs have tried to get past the NAT problem? I heard that mnet,
> > the p2p program uses a ticketing system to pass messages. Any other
> > programs that have attempted to do nat-to-nat and done so successfully?
> > In particular - VoIP?
>
> <snip>
> I'm used to the VPN world so for me the obvious choice is to set up a
> VPN tunnel between home and office.  Hopefully it's not a major concern
> but an added benefit is that your VoIP is encrypted and not subject to
> useful interception.  OpenS/WAN (http://www.openswan.org) should work
> nicely if your are running Linux on your gateway.

But, as a discussion on this list pointed out about a week ago, you can't do 
that if neither of the endpoints which you wish to communicate have publicly 
routable addresses.

I think to specify Jago's requirement slightly more explicitly, he has a 
machine at home, which is SNATted out to the Internet (and therefore cannot 
receive connections in from the Internet), and he has a machine at work which 
is in the same situation - it is SNATted behind a firewall so that the 
machine can connect to the Internet, but the Internet cannot connect to the 
machine.

Therefore the requirement here is to break the security policy of both his 
employer and his home ISP by linking together two machines which have been 
assigned non-routable addresses.

Regards,

Antony.

-- 
This email was created using 100% recycled electrons.

                                                     Please reply to the list;
                                                           please don't CC me.



  reply	other threads:[~2004-01-30 20:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-01-30 20:11 Apps that try to do net-to-nat Jago Pearce
2004-01-30 20:40 ` John A. Sullivan III
2004-01-30 20:53   ` Antony Stone [this message]
2004-01-30 21:26     ` John A. Sullivan III

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200401302053.13354.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk \
    --to=antony@soft-solutions.co.uk \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox