From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Antony Stone Subject: Re: Problems with kernel 2.6.1 and iptables Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 10:47:18 +0000 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <200402161047.18866.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk> References: <005801c3f475$91a645d0$2d64a8c0@pcjka> <1076927162.2333.6.camel@raylinux.internal> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1076927162.2333.6.camel@raylinux.internal> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: 'netfilter' On Monday 16 February 2004 10:26 am, Ray Leach wrote: > The 'filter' table does not exist by default, but the 'FILTER' table > does. Is this a user chain than you created? I think you're getting confused here about the difference between chains and tables. Chains are normally named in uppercase; standard ones are INPUT, OUTPUT, PREROUTING, POSTROUTING, FORWARD. User-defined chains can of course be added. Tables are normally named in lowercase; standard ones are filter, nat, mangle. Adding a user-defined table is quite a significant programming task, and not to be assumed in a reasonably standard configuration of netfilter :) The 'filter' table should exist in any healthy netfilter install. Regards, Antony. -- If at first you don't succeed, destroy all the evidence that you tried. Please reply to the list; please don't CC me.