From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Gale Subject: Re: advantage and disadvantage between iptables and ISAServer? Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 08:49:59 -0700 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <20040225084959.471bb675@mgalepc.utilitran.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="euc-kr" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Performance / Stability ? I am not to familure with ISA because the M$ admins here tell me it is not = worth the enough to test it out. I would assume it is like any other M$ product t= hough ... you need double or triple the hardware to run it as compared to iptable= s. You are stuck with the options the M$ provides instead of the endless possibilities the a Unix or Linux could offer. But I will give Microsoft this ... they make a nice user friendly desktop OS that my mom can use. Michael. On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 09:00:33 +0000 "Monty Ree" wrote: > Hello, all. >=20 > I would like to know the advantage and disadvantage between iptables and= =20 > ISAServer(www.isaserver.org). >=20 > Anyone who has used ISAserver for firewall? > What's the advantage and disadvantage about ISA against iptables?=20 >=20 > Any comments or any documents(BMT..etc..), so thanks. >=20 >=20 > Thanks in advance. >=20 > _________________________________________________________________ > =C3=A5=BB=F3=C0=A7=BF=A1 =B4=D9=B8=AE =BF=C3=B8=AE=B0=ED =B4=C0=B1=DF=C7= =CF=B0=D4 =C1=F1=B1=E4=B4=D9... MSN =BF=C2=B6=F3=C0=CE =BB=F3=BF=B5=B0=FC = =20 > http://vod.msn.co.kr =20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 --=20 Michael Gale Network Administrator Utilitran Corporation