From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michelle Konzack Subject: Re: ULOG: invalid argument Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 19:14:37 +0100 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <20040305181437.GE8522@freenet.de> References: <20040305174440.GB8522@freenet.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Am 2004-03-05 18:51:06, schrieb Jozsef Kadlecsik: >On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Michelle Konzack wrote: > >> >> # iptables: Invalid argment (the same error) >> > >> >Please make sure there is no iptables binary from your distribution which >> >precedes in PATH the iptables binary installed from source. > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > >> This is not possibel, because he use the Debian nativ-system. >> ...he has not written that he has used >> apt-get install ulogd > ^^^^^ False, you have overread the line above... He has done an apt-get build-dep ulogd apt-get -b source ulogd which I was talking about. The 'iptables' from WOODY are working fine Maybe he has gorgotten to install it ;-) Like me =8> whitch will replace the originating version. > >Best regards, >Jozsef Greetings Michelle -- Registered Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/