Re: What is missed for port forwarding

[Kai Weber <kai.weber@glorybox.de>]

* Antony Stone <Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk>:

> Which machine is that (192.168.1.2)?   Is it the machine running the above 
> rules, or another machine on yur internal LAN, with packets being routed by 
> the netfilter box?

The router has 192.168.1.250, 192.168.1.2 is the box the packets should
be forwarded to.

> Do you have a FORWARD rule allowing traffic to 192.168.1.2:80?
> Do you have a rule allowing the reply packets (probably an ESTABLISHED,RELATED 
> rule)?

The 3 rules from my first mail are the only rules I have. All chain
policies are set to ACCEPT.

> What happens if you telnet to port 80 on 192.168.1.2?   Is there a service 
> listening on that port?

Of course there is a running Apache on that port. I have no firewall on
192.168.1.2.

The strange thing: the rule for portforwarding for SSH works. The
package counter for that rules is increasing when I try to connect to
that port. But there is now response.

--  
  Kai Weber
» kai.weber@glorybox.de   http://www.glorybox.de   gpg-key: 0x594D4132