From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Antony Stone Subject: Re: FORWARD RULE -- please help Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 08:46:46 +0000 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <200403090846.46608.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk> References: <20040309075404.92394.qmail@web13206.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20040309075404.92394.qmail@web13206.mail.yahoo.com> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org On Tuesday 09 March 2004 7:54 am, Nilesh wrote: > 203.129.224.149 is my firewall machine running > IPTABLES and 192.168.0.22 is my local machine on 2090 > port service is running > > 202.129.227.3 is his firewall IP and 192.168.1.25 is > his local machine where on 2090 port services is > running > > I want to communicate this both internal > machines(192.168.0.22 and 192.168.1.25) through > firewall If you want his 192.168.1.0/24 network to be able to communicate with your 192.168.0.0/24 network then you should investigate IP in IP tunnelling / encapsulation (see the Linux Advanced Routing Guide at http://lartc.org for a simple guide to how to do this), or else set up a VPN (eg : FreeS/WAN, or the IPsec implementation built into the 2.6 kernel). Regards, Antony. -- If at first you don't succeed, destroy all the evidence that you tried. Please reply to the list; please don't CC me.